Restoration

Last Sunday, Annette and I visited the Automotive Heritage Museum in Ypsilanti, Michigan. Located in what was the last operating Hudson automobile dealership in the world, this great little museum showcases several dozen beautifully restored cars dating from the 1920s through the 1970s. Despite the decades of – in some cases – very hard use, the dents, scars, dings, and faded paint have all been reversed, and the cars have been brought back to factory-perfect conditions. They are now worth many times their original sticker prices.

I recently saw an ad in Hemings Automotive News – a publication specializing in used vintage care – offering a perfectly restored 1959 Chevrolet Impala. Although it originally sold for about $2,900, the 2025 asking price was $125,000. The highest reported auction sale price for a restored 1959 Impala was $368,500. That’s more than 11 times its original sticker price, once inflation is factored in. Restored cars can be incredibly valuable!

So can other things that have been restored.

The reason Annette aand I (and both our kids) were in Michigan was for the funeral of my 96-year-old mother-in-law, Helene Bleecker who died on July 10. The minister who conducted the service referenced Psalm 23. You know, “The Lord is my shepherd.” This psalm consists of 15 phrases, a few of which the pastor highlighted.

One phrase that caught my ear was, “He restores my soul.” Helene’s last months were filled with pain, disorientation, and confusion. As a strong believer in Jesus, she is now with him in heaven. Her body is fully restored. Her relationships with those who have gone before her are fully restored. And – most importantly – her soul is now fully restored. All the limitations and faults of people who know Jesus dissolve when they enter his presence.

So Helene has received the ultimate restoration.

But a careful reading of the psalms reveals another aspect of restoration. David says the Lord “restores my soul” – a present tense verb that implies a “here-and-now” process which is a down-payment on the ultimate restoration to come.

God created each of us out of his love for us, and he wants us to love him back. Unfortunately, each of us is marred by sin – our own and that of others – so we are twisted versions of what God originally intended. When we recognize our perversion and our need to receive forgiveness from Jesus, he begins our transformation. If we let him, he continues the process throughout the rest of our times on earth and brings it to completion when we stand before him in heaven.

In 1 Corinthians 15:42-44, Paul draws parallels between our earthly bodies – which are sown as perishable, in dishonor, in weakness, and as natural – and what they will be when they are raised as imperishable, in glory, in power, and as spiritual bodies. That’s what Helene is experiencing right now.

So last weekend, we got to see two examples of restoration: that of many classic automobiles, and – more importantly – that of my dear mother-in-law. Just as no one would have imagined that a fully restored 1959 Impala would be worth many times more than its original price 66 years later, it’s hard for us to comprehend what a perfectly restored person standing in God’s presence will be like. But I’m glad I will experience that one day! And I hope you will too.

Andy, Glenn, Annette and Stephanie at Dover Township Cemetery

A New Twist on Answering One of the Most Common Objections to Christianity

 
World Religions.jpg
 

How often have you heard this one? 

“You’re telling me that only Christians go to heaven? What about someone who was brought up in a different faith or people from remote areas who never even heard of Jesus? How is it fair for God to condemn them to hell?”

This may be the single most common objection to biblical Christianity. How do you respond to that?

First, let me outline a tried-and-true, solid answer, and then I’ll extend that argument a bit.

The first thing to recognize is that God is absolutely righteous (i.e., fair) in his judgment (Acts 17:31). Next, Paul deals with the exclusivity question in Romans 1. He begins by explaining that no one who rejects God’s existence can accuse him of being unfair because God’s invisible attributes,

namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him (Romans 1:19-20).  

In other words, absolutely everyone should know that God exists.

Tony Evans takes this thought process to the next step when he explains that

God will judge people according to the light they have. Thus, those who sinned without the law (Romans 2:12) . . . will be judged according to the law that is written on their hearts” (The Tony Evans Bible Commentary, p. 1119).

Or putting it another way, people won’t be held accountable for something they don’t know about. Essentially, this is an argument from the lesser to the greater. Let me explain.

For the sake of discussion, let me arbitrarily suggest there may be eight or nine “levels” of belief involved in becoming a Christian. (There may be fewer or more.) The first step might be acknowledging there is some kind of god. The second might be that this god has a personality (as opposed to being a vague “force”). The third point might be that this god created us. And so on. The final step is acknowledging my personal sin that can only be dealt with by Jesus’ sacrificial death on my behalf and committing my life to him.

Here’s why this is an argument from the lesser to the greater. The thoughts are getting more and more specific. If someone denies the very existence of God (a pretty “mild” belief), there is no way they will surrender to Christ’s lordship (a very demanding one). This means that even if someone has never heard of Jesus, they can be held accountable for having “rejected him” (Step 8) if they deny that God even exists in the first place (Step 1).

This is a well-known line of reasoning and can be quite effective. My addition to this thought pattern is to push it to its logical conclusion. If someone rejects the Christian message as “unfair” to people who have never heard or were brought up in a different faith, they are rejecting Paul’s teaching in Acts 17:31 and denying God’s fairness. “I would never condemn someone for not responding to something they never even heard of.” But stop for a minute. They are implicitly claiming that their sense of fairness is greater than God’s. Do you really think it’s wise to go there?

This may be one of those “slow burn” thoughts that someone has to mull over for a while before they recognize how presumptuous it is. Although I have only shared this logic with a few people, I have yet to have someone be willing to admit that they consider themselves to be more fair than God is.

What do you think? Does this argument fly?